Health and genetics

Table of Contents

1. AASI height

Gangetic Plains Mesolithic Hunter Gatherers of India were the tallest on Earth, much taller than their European counterparts.

Damdama HG had a mean height of (179.1 cm /5′10.5″) for males & (173.0 cm / 5’8") for females.

Mahadaha males had a mean height of (181.1 cm / 5’11.3")

aasi_height.png

Gangetic Plain Mesolithic females (5’7“-5’8”) were taller in mean stature than Western-European males of the time.

Not only were they very tall, but also quite muscular and likely involved in a lot of strenuous physical activity, indicated by hypertrophy in the forearms and legs. Specifically of the anconeus & supinator muscles (although no evidence of physical trauma)

aasi_height_2.png

aasi_height_3.jpeg

Furthermore, the Indus Valley Rakhigarhi reconstructed individuals from Lee, Shinde et al 2020 were in the same ballpark too. The 17-18 yr old boy had a height of 177 cm (5 ft 10 inches) while the adult female was 5 ft 6 inches tall.

aasi_height_4.png

height.png

Polygenic scores for height among modern populations, from Davide Piffer’s substack.

In sub-Sahara and in the subcontinent especially, phenotypic height lags far behind genotypic height. From these scores, you should expect Tamils to be taller than Chinese and (South) Italians.

aasi_height_polygenic.jpeg

aasi_height_polygenic_2.jpeg

Also from Piffer’s substack: Sardinians have the lowest polygenic scores for height among all included populations (though we haven’t got scores for Mbuti or Twa)

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6931495/

Yeah this is what you see with Singaporean Tamils; their average male height is 5’8", which is higher than e.g. Middle-Eastern and Southern European populations.

There’s a lot of stunting and undernutrition in India.

Singaporean Tamil example is most notable because that migration was largely not selective (went there as indentured labourers).

2. fat/muscle gain among Indians

Indians gain both fat & muscle at slightly higher rates than Whites.

But you will find such random genetic differences in every population, only Indians/subcontinentals treat them as immutable and construct Grand Wordcel Theories of Everything based on them.

https://www.physoc.org/abstracts/a-comparison-of-the-effects-of-resistance-exercise-training-on-muscle-mass-and-function-in-south-asians-and-white-europeans/

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-022-06446-7/figures/1

3. agriculture-induced genetic changes

New paper from David Reich lab:

West Eurasian / European populations have had strong recent genetic selection for a number of traits.

Among these, positive selection for intelligence and education. Negative selection for body fat percentage, darker skin color, and schizophrenia

agriculture_genetic_changes.jpeg

https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.09.14.613021v1

4. white rice intolerance

East Asians quite literally have evolutionary adaptations to eat white rice.

The rest of the world, should regard ourselves as White-Rice-intolerant.

Landini et al (2020), Genomic adaptations to cereal‐based diets contribute to mitigate metabolic risk in some human populations of East Asian ancestry

Author: NiṣādaHermaphroditarchaṃśa (Mal'ta boy ka parivar)

Created: 2025-08-27 Wed 20:55