Agency, bhōsaḍpillers and Party Workers vs Customers ⭐
Table of Contents
1. Purposefulness and party workers vs customers
According to rightoids, the goal of politics is to:
- express their opinions aimlessly, “call out” bad things and debate them endlessly
- generate self-serving cope
- entertainment
According to leftists, the goal of politics is:
TO WIN.
“To crush your enemies, to see them driven before you, to hear the oaths of allegiance of their children …”
Rightoids see themselves as customers, asking “What can my leader do for me?”
Leftists see themselves as party workers, asking at every stage “What can I do for my party?”
(Instead their customers are “marginalized minority groups”, “endangered animals”, “the environment”, Muslims etc. — whom they hold as sacred but not capable of agency, and therefore must be protected)
Be purposeful with your political engagement. Stop treating it as a platform to dump your frustrations in life. Be mindful of:
- what are you trying to achieve, with every word?
- is this the best way to achieve that, or can you think of something better?
- are you making your team and yourself look good? Does it make people want to join your team?
- have you really thought about whether what you’re saying is true? Or are you just saying something it’s fashionable to say?
FN: This is not a difference of specific actions and behaviour but of underlying mentality — [this distinction is important to grasp for yourself, you should meditate on it for 2 minutes — when your underlying goals are clear to you and shared across your movement, that means even when leftists do something similar to rightists for strategic purposes, they know why they’re doing it, and so know how to co-ordinate their actions better, know what degree to do it to, where it’s appropriate, and so on.]
1.1. customers
Observation: RWs primarily see themselves as “customers” to be pleased by their party, while leftists see themselves as “party workers”.
Leftists instead see “disadvantaged groups” etc. as the customers.
This is the cause of a lot of b**sadpilling and uselessness from RWs.
1.2. wife
Indian RW public behaves with Modi/Hindutva leadership like the boomer stereotype of an annoying entitled wife with her husband.
Constantly making demands, starting stupid fights with random people knowing he will protect her, and throwing random obstacles to test him.
2. Agency and incels
Past few days have made me massively revise🔼 my estimate of the threat of the incel problem in RW.
Take any normal guy going through a rough patch—
excuse his failures as the mistakes of society
deny him any agency or personal responsibility
in fact tell him he should lash out at anyone who tells him to take some responsibility (because the people telling him are also part of that evil society trying to keep him down, why are they blaming him rather than fixing society)—
… and you have a very seductive meme, and a contagious mental illness, which renders the infected completely impotent at doing anything useful.
(After all, if “society” is preventing you from getting your life in order, to kahā hyper-traditionalist Hindu Rāṣṭra sthāpit karoge?)
I have often said that the worst thing that can happen to a group is to receive the friendship of the left. Compare each of these pairs which faced say comparable levels of “oppression”/shitty circumstances:
Dalits got leftist support, H Partition refugees didn’t.
Muslims got it, Hindus didn’t.
US blacks got it, Jews didn’t.
dEcOlOnIzEd gLoBaL SoUtH countries got it, Singapore didn’t.
In each case, the group that received the largesse of the left is in an absolute shithole situation. Because they paid for it with their their future, their honour, their sovls. Because leftism regards these groups like cattle: sacred, but in constant need of protection and provision. Devoid of agency.
Well, what leftism did to all these groups, incelism is doing to our guys. Except at least the left gives its protected groups “protection and provision and sacred status”: these guys aren’t getting anything!
Leftism can give stuff to their client groups because their movement is full of resourceful, guilt-ridden UCs/whites/rich countries/etc. who provide for the sacred client groups — whereas your movement is just comprised of … other incels … who also hold themselves sacred and deserving like you do.
Who’s going to bell the cat, bro? Which one of you is going to get up from the couch and actually do something?
“Don’t bother approaching girls—it’s their parents’ fault for not teaching them to be be chaste until marriage—it’s your parents fault for not teaching you to be more sociable”
“Don’t work 72h/wk—it’s the boomers’ fault for not creating a better economy—it’s the corporates’ fault for not being more generous”
“Don’t bother going to the gym or planning your diet—it’s your parents’ fault for feeding you carbslop—it’s your ancestor’s faults for not being taller”
“Don’t bother voting for BJP—it’s Modi’s fault for not solving absolutely everything in his first 2 terms”
If you think about it for two seconds, none of these are natural thoughts at all for a young man. To sit around fearing extremely unlikely risks, avoiding responsibility and prefering to blame society so you don’t have to do anything, acting like dating is some “obligation” being pushed on them … this isn’t normal male behaviour. It is brainrot.
3. Our Useless Bhōsaḍpillers vs Their Glorious Extremists
Are you a bhōsaḍpiller looking to be less useless in life? Here are some tips!
In the US sometimes the far-left also “bhōsaḍpills” against their party: saying “both parties are the same” “voting is useless” “we need to firebomb Walmarts” etc.
The difference is that they get a ton of shit done for their ideology, even more so than their party mainstream does: they capture institutions and infect the memespace and culture, they write the actual agendas for their party to actually implement, they run bullying and cancellation campaigns, they riot on the streets—
(—heck, when you look at it this way, “mainstream Democrats” are just petty functionaries for their far-left overlords, serving to do PR and earn legitimacy for the leftists—)
… which creates a certain “good cop bad cop” effect in people’s minds; the subtle threat of “hey, if you don’t vote for us, we have worse guys out there—we’re the only ones who can protect you from them”
(BTW this is the theory behind the “chagnon-pill” — it’s not that people like people who will kill them, but rather they will like people who are evidently (though left unsaid) on the same side as the people who will kill them. Either because they seek protection in the good cop from the bad cop, or evaluate him relatively to his company the bad cop.)
Meanwhile our bhōsaḍpillers do … literally nothing.
There is no feeling of danger that they evoke in people. Even more importantly they do not actually achieve any right-wing goals in the cultural sphere. In fact they don’t even have any definable right-wing ideology most of the time — they romanticize pre-1991 India (because “no OBC reservations” or whatever), they seethe and chimp out at Nārāyaṇa Mūrthī telling them they should work hard, they find common cause with Muslims, they whine and seethe about racism (while being very crassly casteist at the same time). Their only identifying feature is opposition to the mainstream right-wing.