Modern liberalism as the ideology of dehātization ⭐
Table of Contents
1. Left-liberalism as Mlecchavāda: the belief in The Triumph of Noble Savagedom
Modern liberalism is the ideology of dehātization (in contrast to Sanskritization), the belief that in every matter, the less productive, less civilized, less human elements should triumph over the reverse.
criminals over Productive Humans
ruinous or backward religions and cultures over those which bring Value
hedonistic sexual deviances over Reproduction
nature over Man
poverty and stagnation over Wealth and growth
nihilism over Civilization
“lived experience” and feelings over rational argument
mentally illness and “trauma” over Normalcy
broken families over Healthy ones
meaningless empty “turmeric chai latte south asian” symbolism over actually robust Hindu values
You may steelman them by saying “No, they just support the oppressed, they just don’t think the inferior ought to be oppressed”. “It’s not that they promote single mothers with 10 abortions, they just don’t want stigma against them.”
But in every instance the “oppressed” party actually manages to get over it and be better than their oppressors—be it Hindus over their former muslim rulers, Israelis over their hateful neighbours, market minorities in the muslim world or southeast asia, Asian immigrants in the US, Kaśmīrī Paṇḍits—the left invariably despises them.
Instead, the only way one curries the favour of the left, get a share of its power, is by being as broken, as unproductive and as destructive as possible.
2. libs approve of chai turmeric hinduism
If Hindus sided with Western Liberals, this wouldn't happen I will never understand why Hindus try to side with Right Wing Christians who hate pagans
Delusional. Hindus were voting ~90% Democrat until 2024 and are heavily entrenched in woke/prog causes.
Liberals would happily accept nominal “Hindus” into their fold, provided you: abandon Hindutva, tolerate attacks by Ms, form a united front with Pakistan to be a meat-grinder against China, and restrict your Hindu identity to turmeric chai-latte, Taj Mahal and LARPing as goddesses and nature-worshipping hippies while you sing praises of Aurangazeb.
Please do not think Liberals are dumb or easy to manipulate. The battle lines are already drawn, and they understand this very well. Their fundamental ideology is dehātization: they believe that in every circumstance and every conflict, the primitive, barbaric and criminal side should prevail over the advanced, civilized and productive — as the former is always perceived as the “victim”.
The only way to gain their support is to give up everything you care about, and become the former (primitive, barbaric and criminal).
3. Leftism as inverse Hinduism
The 3 goals (Puruṣārtha) are Artha, Dharma and Kāma. Leftism worships Degrowth, Barbarism and Ugliness.
The 3 obligations (Ṛṇatraya) are to produce children, to learn and to maintain religion. Leftism says you have no such obligations.
Leftism is the inversion of Hinduism.
4. recursive revolution
Yeah he’s been fully educated in western leftist thought.
The leftist dream is a Permanent “Recursive” Revolution or suicide-chain: each group abnegates to “empower” the group below it (while keeping them backward materially, because backwardness is the ideal), then passes them the torch to abnegate themselves for the next group, ad infinitum.
The 1000-year plan finally concludes with queer aborginal australian muslims sacrificing themselves (the last of the human race) to nature, which is the most backward of them all.
5. Culture
The early Hindus held the culture of Kuru-Pañcāla to be the high culture that all men everywhere should emulate; Islam similarly held Arabic culture as high culture.
Left-liberalism holds the Dehāt as high culture.
These are middle-aged PhDs with prestigious careers, talking like snotty teenagers or sassy black drag queens.
This is dehātization.
The basic rot in “Western” (more generally “democratic”) culture is it places the dehāt at highest status, as the objective of aspiration.
Ever notice how when attacking cultural “hypocrisy”, libs always subtly take the side of the vice?
E.g. “hypocrite man tells woman not to smoke”—implication here is the woman should smoke, not that the man shouldn’t
Likewise for “hypcorite parents”, “hypocrite religious people”
6. Left-liberalism vs communism, and its self-conception
Greek math : Indian math ~ Communism : Left-liberalism ~ Jñāna-mārga : Bhakti-mārga
The former derives beliefs from strict axiomatic foundations while the latter derives it more intuitively/instinctively by deriving things in random directions in a memespace.
Feynman called it “Greek school vs Babylonian school” IIRC.