Importance of a positive vision, and knowing WHY you believe what you believe ⭐
Table of Contents
1. Importance of knowing WHY you believe what you believe
If you want to understand why Modi takes his slow methodical approach instead of going all out against our enemies, look no further than the bhōsaḍpillers sympathizing with Palestine and cuckseething at their fellow Hindus for supporting Israel.
Our e-shers will fold the moment the first drop of enemy blood hits the soil. The moment that they start feeling the heat from Western leftists and Muslim diaspora—international condemnations, Instagram bimbos seething at “Hindutvas”, posts on black twitter with 1 million likes—the moment they see a story about how some innocent kid was orphaned or some parents sobbing because their leftist kid got jailed, they will turn their ire toward Modi, seething at him for ruining their “PR” and “international image”. Not only will they demand an end to the tāṇḍav, they will turn their backs on Hindutva itself.
The fundamental problem is: while our e-shers love to fantasize about violence and post cauliflower memes, they do not truly understand why the brutality they call for is necessary.
(And, as is true in learning and in political beliefs—if you don’t understand why, your knowledge/beliefs will be flimsy and easy to change.)
Instead their entire ideology is motivated by insecurity. They want violence not because they realize it as a necessary step in achieving some positive vision, but because they are insecure about their incapacity to do it—and they hope that violence will earn them some international izzat.
And when it instead elicits kaḍi nindā, they will fold.
(aside: This is also part of the reason why they do stupid things like equating Muslims & other religious minorities. They’ve been told that “Right-wing is about being based and brutalizing minorities”, and are just LARPing as that without understanding why. Of course, RW boomers do this as well, but only for Christians, and for a different reason — they have an outdated world model in which Muslims and Christians are both the Goliath.)
It is a 4.5 front war. “Internal enemies” (who are really Transnational rather than internal/external) were always the biggest front. The 0.5 front is the questionable reliability of our own validation-addicts. Until that is solved (via Nirṇaya-pilling and increasing their testosterone levels), there can be no tāṇḍav.
2. superiority complex
Indians (like western europeans) have a very specific type of superiority complex: the type that goes “we ARE superior” rather than “we SHOULD BE superior”.
For Whites this is because the Industrial Revolution made them for a long period the top race in the world; for Indians this is ancestral memory of Pax Gupta, as al-Beruni astutely observed.
This is both why these two races were first susceptible to wokeness (as counter-signalling) as well as why even the RWs, who don’t counter-signal, prefer to engage in chest-thumping rather than actually crushing the menace.
What if I told you Indians’ infighting is actually due to a bad form of abundance mindset rather than scarcity mindset
We think we’re so great that external threats are irrelevant
3. Importance of reiterating the RW positive vision and policies/values
Something that came up in convo with @ShazCoder: discussion (or assumption) of policy/values needs to be more omnipresent in RW discourse, so it keeps getting instilled in both existing supporters and new converts. Otherwise you end up with the Rāytā problem, like MAGA: making the new converts your thought leaders because you have no thoughts of your own.
We cannot dream of replacing the Leftist Ideological Aether if we do not even fill our own spaces with a RW Ideological Aether. This is why I keep going after “bhōsaḍpilling”: we need ideological hardliners, and cannot cede them away to the bhōsaḍ-trap.
The Svayambodha of Capitalism and Hindu sovereignty. Needs to be relentlessly reiterated, argued for, and reinforced by implicitly assuming them in discourse on every issue. With zero tolerance for anyone who tries to monkey-balance* on these.
*The difference between monkey-balancing and moderating is that moderating just means being silent about radical things, or disavowing if pressed, or disavowing when a, while monkey-balancing means actually randomly jumping on the other side to virtue-signal.
4. Discourse is important
People forget that at Pax Censorship, it was regular US conservatives being censored on accusations of racism, not actual open “racists”.
Censorship doesn’t “push ideas underground” as copers claim. It totally decimated normal conservatism and made them incoherent retards.
5. Actually-Making-The-Argument
RWs need to practice the habit of Actually-Making-The-Argument.
It’s inexcusable that until I posted this, the replies were all just “chup kar”, “you prefer Islamist India?” “wait for Yogi to burn your ass”.
Everyone needs to make at least very basic efforts like this. Consciously focus on short, tidbit/meme-sized points that would immediately flip a bystander’s view.
[There is a time and place to just name-call people as Congressi and Muslim—that is when informing the in-group of who is Congressi and Muslim. But you do have to Actually-Make-The-Argument.]
As that dipshit Ankit Mishra said: “The right mistakes volume for argument, and outrage for ideology.”
6. That’s not the game
RWs don’t understand what the game even is.
Basic Hindu “imagery” is already omnipresent. People already have affinity for gods, epics.
That is not what’s missing. And acting as if you liking Hindu gods is some brave political point just comes off as nauseating.
https://x.com/JaipurDialogues/status/1839665173558124980
This is why RWs sound ridiculous when they say things like “why are we taught only about Mughals and not great kings like Ashoka??”
There’s indeed a ton of “neglected” Indian history, but anything that you, a basic बिच् rāytā फ्यागट्, can name, isn’t among it.