On “Abrahamism”
“Abrahamism” is like saying Kapil & Kanwal Sibal follow “Sibalism”, or Mani-shankar & Swaminathan Aiyer follow “Aiyerism”.
Islam is the second-largest political force in the world after her husband Left-liberalism; together they are our greatest threat.
Christianity is a shell of its former self, which literally <50% of Europeans so much as pay lip service to. It is not the ideology that motivates the actions of its nominal adherents, or the countries they run.
When some leftist NGO impedes our growth, when the Deep State does a coup in Bangladesh* or sues Adani in a kangaroo-court, the motivator isn’t “Christianity”, it’s leftism. You can bet that they engage in the exact same subversion against Christians, and in their own countries. Liberals do not have any loyalty towards any traditional religion or country, only towards the new religion and the Liberal Raj.
In any case, Christians and Muslims do not see themselves as allied, and nudging them towards teaming up against us by grouping them as “Abrahamics” is quite dumb.
I hammer this point so much not out of some deep love for Christians, but because Indian RW’s world models are always at least 75 years out of date, which leads to them acting in highly useless and counter-productive ways. Audrey Truschke will say something dumb, and Indians will respond by lashing out criticizing her for Christianity’s historical flaws or “colonialism”, not realizing that she’s snickering on the inside, happy to have our help against her other enemies.
It’s like playing TrapAdventure2 in geopolitics.
